Hello everyone On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:13 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Andre Broersen wrote: > >> Marsha to Dan, David and Andre: >> >> Possibly the path to the DQ experience might be said to be possible from >> different directions. >> >> Andre: >> I think none of us are disputing this Marsha. My reason for posting this was >> to suggest an alternative phrasing of the term 'perfecting' David used. I >> feel that the use of the term 'mastering' avoids connotations that the term >> 'perfecting' may evoke. But I could be missing the point completely of >> course...being a Dutchman. :-[ >> > > Hi Andre, > > Didn't get that sudden enlightenment (awakening) was being considered. Those > of this persuasion would say nothing needs to be done about anything. Maybe > this is closer to what Dan is stating when he says that Dynamic Quality > doesn't require getting this perfect or mastering that, but that Dynamic > Quality is alway right here. That's how I interpreted Dan, but I could be > wrong.
Hi Marsha No, you're right. David Harding seemed to be saying the only way we experience Dynamic Quality is by working, working, working, until we are perfect. And I disagree. I'll never be perfect. I hold that to be an impossible goal. And yet I experience Dynamic Quality all the time. Maybe there are two schools of thought on this, as you say. Still, if a person sets for themselves a goal to obtain that which they already have, just what is it they are seeking? Thank you, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
