Hi Dan, The way I interpreted David, was that work was needed to become aware of dynamic quality. Sure, it is all pervasive, but many are not personally aware of this. Thus the discipline.
Thanks, Mark >>> >> >> Hi Andre, >> >> Didn't get that sudden enlightenment (awakening) was being considered. >> Those of this persuasion would say nothing needs to be done about anything. >> Maybe this is closer to what Dan is stating when he says that Dynamic >> Quality doesn't require getting this perfect or mastering that, but that >> Dynamic Quality is alway right here. That's how I interpreted Dan, but I >> could be wrong. [Mark] Certainly that is true once one becomes aware. As Zen would say, the mountains once again become the mountains. Cheers, Mark > > Hi Marsha > > No, you're right. David Harding seemed to be saying the only way we > experience Dynamic Quality is by working, working, working, until we > are perfect. And I disagree. I'll never be perfect. I hold that to be > an impossible goal. And yet I experience Dynamic Quality all the time. > > Maybe there are two schools of thought on this, as you say. Still, if > a person sets for themselves a goal to obtain that which they already > have, just what is it they are seeking? [Mark] Better awareness of such. It is like learning to enjoy classical music more fully, for example. There is no mystery only practice. Some of us experience Dynamic Quality as fully as we want, that is great. Others seek more. > > Thank you, > Mark > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
