Arlo previously: > Marsha is trapped in a world where she still thinks in terms of existential > reality, rather than being able to understands an empirical, experiential > reality. All is not "no-thing", my motorcycle is very empirically real and > valuable to me, and the activity it enables is as real as real can be. <snip>
Hi Arlo and All, I admit I am old, and, perhaps, senile. Certainly if there is no existential reality, a person cannot be trapped. IMHO SQ can only describe the intellectual level of evolution SQ. Imho there is an emotional level in evolution DQ only. To respond to your statement I would acknowledge that to declare DQ/SQ exists and is not a description of existence leaves existence trapped in evolution, and no static SQ levels are possible. Joe On 5/11/11 3:14 PM, "ARLO J BENSINGER JR" <[email protected]> wrote: > [Joe] > Evolution describes existential reality. > > [Arlo] > I don't see it this way at all. Do you mean that Darwin, personally, believed > in existential reality and thus his theory can only refer to the evolution of > existential patterns? > > [Joe] > How is Evolution DQ/SQ trapped in an existential reality which is different > from an empirical, experiential reality? > > [Arlo] > I'm not sure your question. Are you asking how existential and experiential > are > different? Or are you asking how, in your opinion, DQ/SQ is "trapped" in an > existential reality? > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
