On 5/15/11 11:53 AM, "Andre Broersen" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
> The whole excercise is a hopeless revelation of SOM because we use language.
> As matter of fact: the MOQ really is SOM (a la Platt and BO). It is a figment
> of our imagination to think otherwise.
<snip>
Hi Andre and All,
I do not know why your post bothers me so. Self and individuality are both
indefinable in an evolutionary setting. Does that mean that self and
individuality are unreal? I think it means that to see existence and
essence as describing the same thing, like the nature of an individual, is
in error. Evolution matters, and the characterization of Quality as an
adjective or a noun matters.
Joe
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
