Hi Andre and all,

The way I see evolution is order in existence.  I see morality as appealing
to order in existence for its foundation.  For morality Evolution matters.

Joe

On 5/16/11 1:09 PM, "Andre Broersen" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Joe to Andre and All:
> I do not know why your post bothers me so.
> 
> Andre:
> Hey Joe. I don't know either. Perhaps it is my sometimes rather crude
> and direct way of saying things. When it comes to the MOQ I want to
> defend its hard fought for 'space'(in the way Jaynes uses it in his 'The
> origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind'). .. you
> know the root expansion of rationality...a spiritual rationality. (ZMM)
> 
> And this leads to your following statement that 'Self and individuality
> are both indefinable in an evolutionary setting'.
> 
> I cannot find much wrong with this statement, not any contradiction with
> the MOQ (as far as I am aware) but where you got this from I am confused
> about (was it in my post?). The snippet you took from my post was a
> rather facetious and at the same time a sarcastic comment towards Marsha
> and her hangers-on commenting on the framework from within which they
> are operating.
> 
> It is not MOQ. It is SOM.
> 
> And I maintain this, no matter how much Marsha tries to evoke a Buddhist
> type interpretation. She has said herself she is no Buddhist, not even a
> student of such. So any pretended defense in the name of Buddhism is,
> for me, a wank. A dishonest travesty. A pretense at forwarding a point
> of view about which she knows nothing...yet claiming authority without
> understanding what she claims.
> 
> And just to be clear. Buddhist philosophy is not SOM.
> 
> Getting back to your question Joe: Does that mean that self and
> individuality are unreal?
> 
> I do not think that 'self' nor 'individuality' are unreal. They are
> useful patterns of value.
> 
> Joe:
> I think it means that to see existence and essence as describing the
> same thing, like the nature of an individual, is in error.
> 
> Andre:
> I fully agree with you. I have never understood what 'existence'  means.
> The word 'essence' I have begun to associate with Ham so I can wipe that
> one as well. And then you mention the 'nature of an individual'. I have
> no idea what you mean other than the MOQ's description of Lila.
> 
> Joe:
> Evolution matters,...
> 
> Andre:
> Why does evolution matter to you Joe?
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to