Hi Mark,
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:48 PM, 118 wrote: > Hi Marsha, > > I was trying to understand what you mean by process. I suppose this > could be considered static since gravitation is fixed at a particular > time. It is my understanding that gravity represents the attraction > of one thing for another. We all exude gravity. So that is one of > its compositions. I would consider it a process since it acts > accordingly. Other part of its composition are the laws which it > appears to follow. Gravity also warps space depending on its > intensity, so warping is a property. Gravity acts on all things > including light, so that may be another. > > Can't think of any more for now. > > I remember asking you what the opposite of a chair is, many years ago. > You replied that it is a non-chair. This still does not make much > sense to me, but it may be moving into Ham's metaphysics of Essence. > So that which is opposite of Gravity would be negated for a short > while into the world of relativity (no pun intended). > > I am not sure if gravity follows the same laws as quantum mechanics. > There has yet to be a theory of everything. So far, cosmology and > quantum mechanics are irreconcilable. > > Thanks for your answer, > > Mark You might have just asked me what I meant by 'process.' Thank you for your reply. Marsha > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:55 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> going to clean this up a little >> >> >> Hello again Mark, >> >> If you were suggesting that 'gravitation' refers to a particular static >> pattern >> of value, what exactly comprises (every last bit of it) that pattern? >> >> Can such a question be answered? If yes, what is the answer? If no, >> why not? >> >> You might understand why, at the moment, I think the best answer would be: >> all-that-is-opposite-from-non-gravitation, and I sometimes visualize the >> pattern >> as a cloud of probability. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:37 AM, MarshaV wrote: >> >>> >>> Mark, >>> >>> You ask a strange question. 'Gravitation' is a word; It may be the name >>> of a cat, >>> dog or horse, or a conceptual theory. At the very least it participates in >>> a linguistic >>> process. >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:31 PM, 118 wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Marsha, >>>> Is gravitation a process? >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2011, at 1:58 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here is my (conventional/static) definition of static patterns of value: >>>>> >>>>> Static patterns of value are processes: impermanent, >>>>> interdependent, ever-changing. (Not objects. Not subjects. >>>>> Not things-in-themselves.) Overlapping, interconnected, >>>>> ever-changing processes that pragmatically tend to persist >>>>> and change within a stable, predictable pattern. >>>>> >>>>> Here's my (conventional/static) definition of reification: >>>>> >>>>> Reification means treating any functioning phenomenon >>>>> as if it were a real, permanent 'thing', rather than an >>>>> impermanent process." >>>>> >>>>> Reification represents how the common man, and many scientists, >>>>> academics and even philosophers conceptualize. It evolved as a tool to >>>>> facilitate some kind of betterness. But it is flawed and of course the >>>>> MoQ >>>>> and help rectify the flaw. I have suggested that reification is either a >>>>> part >>>>> of the conceptualization process, or that there is a interdependency >>>>> between conceptualization and reification. >>>>> >>>>> But, of course, you are correct Mary. Both 'conceptualization' and >>>>> 'reification' are static patterns of value, conventional (relative) >>>>> truths. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
