Hello Mark,
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:48 PM, 118 wrote: > Hi Marsha, > > I was trying to understand what you mean by process. I suppose this > could be considered static since gravitation is fixed at a particular > time. It is my understanding that gravity represents the attraction > of one thing for another. We all exude gravity. So that is one of > its compositions. I would consider it a process since it acts > accordingly. Other part of its composition are the laws which it > appears to follow. Gravity also warps space depending on its > intensity, so warping is a property. Gravity acts on all things > including light, so that may be another. > > Can't think of any more for now. > > I remember asking you what the opposite of a chair is, many years ago. > You replied that it is a non-chair. This still does not make much > sense to me, but it may be moving into Ham's metaphysics of Essence. > So that which is opposite of Gravity would be negated for a short > while into the world of relativity (no pun intended). > > I am not sure if gravity follows the same laws as quantum mechanics. > There has yet to be a theory of everything. So far, cosmology and > quantum mechanics are irreconcilable. > > Thanks for your answer, > > Mark Rather than negating as Ham suggests, I am suggesting more of a proposition of category. If 'gravitation' is the pattern under consideration, I would suggest that an event (a thought for example) will fall into either the category of gravitation or non-gravittion. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
