Hi Mary, On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:58 AM, MarshaV wrote:
> > Here is my (conventional/static) definition of static patterns of value: > > Static patterns of value are processes: impermanent, > interdependent, ever-changing. (Not objects. Not subjects. > Not things-in-themselves.) Overlapping, interconnected, > ever-changing processes that pragmatically tend to persist > and change within a stable, predictable pattern. Dmb has challenged this definition by removing two words (static and ever-changing) from their context (reifying them) and pitting them against each other. As if two words pulled from a definition can in any way represent the whole definition. Besides, one can easily understand 'ever-changing' as the 'evolution' process, which makes it very consistent within MoQ. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
