On Jun 11, 2011, at 3:52 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > Marsha repeated her definition of static patterns and said: > Please note the "ever-changing processes that pragmatically tend to persist > and change within a stable, predictable pattern" part. > > dmb says: > Yes, I've noted that part many times. That's the incoherent, contradictory > part. Either it is stable or it is ever-changing. It's logically impossible > to make both of those claims at the same time. It's nonsense.
Marsha: Think its nonsense if you like. I haven't been seeking for your approval of my definition. > dmb asked: > On what basis do you conclude that these terms [concepts & static patterns] > refer to two different things? > > Marsha replied: > Again, for me concepts and definitions are a part of static patterns of > value. There is not a one-to-one relationship between concepts/definitions > and a pattern. There could be visualizations associated with a pattern for > one example. > > > dmb says: > There is no one-to-one relation the two and concepts are only a part of > patterns? Associated visualizations? Okay, but that still doesn't answer the > question, namely, what the hell are you talking about? Marsha: If you sit very quiet for a while, and think about the MoQ, maybe you can come up with a topic that interests you. > dmb: > I'll give you a thousand dollars to make sense and give a real answer. Go > ahead. Give it shot. It's not even a bet. You can't lose dime. I'm just > saying I'll pay you to produce a coherent explanation of your own claim. Marsha: And this is what someone who claims to have intellectual competency writes. - But thanks again for the attention. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
