Hi David and all, The horse I am wrestling with is evolution! You seem to imply that there is an evolutionary difference between concepts and reality. From the way I look at things that is misguided. Concepts identify reality so they must be a part of reality? Pirsig accepted evolution. It seems that the discrepancy you see between concepts and reality is outside evolution and is a mere active and passive consideration. Is reality conceptual? DQ/SQ! Is evolution conceptual? DQ/SQ!
On 6/13/11 10:28 AM, "david buchanan" <[email protected]> wrote: > But there must always be a discrepancy between concepts reality because the > former are static and the latter is dynamic. The latter is undifferentiated > and the former is all chopped up into bits. Those static bits ARE words and > concepts. To counter the demand for proper use of terms with quotes about > undefined Dynamic Quality is to change the subject from dictionaries to the > mystic reality, from reason to mysticism. To confuse these two things is to > misunderstand the distinction between DQ and static quality. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
