On Jul 3, 2011, at 11:25 AM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> As you know, Buddha did not write anything.  Neither did Socrates or
> Jesus.  So, all we have are interpretations by others of what he is
> claimed to have said.  This is important since it was claimed to be
> recognized by Buddha that words only delimit.
> 
> I am not quite sure what you mean by intuition.  Is it instinct?
> Perhaps intuition is shared awareness.  I have sensed that something
> was happening to someone I cared about.

Marsha:
No this is not what I meant.  Mindfulness is what I meant.  Where the good 
is unfolding, naturally.  That is what I mean.  


> I listen to the birds every morning when I wake up.  This is a form of
> shared awareness for by listening I create.

When Siegfried was able to understand the birdsong, he was in 
tune with intuition.  "The woodbird now sings of a woman sleeping 
on a rock surrounded by magic fire. Siegfried, wondering if he can
learn fear from this woman, heads toward the mountain."  Don't you 
just love it!!!   


> Cheers,
> Mark


Marsha 




> 
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:55 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 3, 2011, at 2:44 AM, 118 wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> 
>>> Buddha was not an atheist, he used the current Gods in his
>>> meditations.  Just read about all the gods that visited him under the
>>> trees that he sat under.  When Pirsig says Atheist, he means
>>> anti-Christian (or Muslem or Jew), he does not mean anti-Gods.
>> 
>> Which translations of the Buddha's words were you reading?   Which
>> translation of RMP's words were you reading?
>> 
>> 
>>> What Pirsig does not understand is that Metaphysics is mystical.  It
>>> is a deep awareness that comes from beyond the Intellect and is then
>>> put to a song of words.  I am not sure how many mystics he spoke with
>>> to create his story about them, but I believe he is mistaken.  Thought
>>> is an expression of Reality, in the same way the certain mystics
>>> apprehend reality but do not encompass it.  Nobody can.  Think of some
>>> mystical experiences you have had, and you will see.
>> 
>> I love all songs.   Woodland birdsong is lovely.  Would you agree?
>> 
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6egZr8-8k2k&NR=1
>> 
>> Anything to say about intuition?  I would like to hear of yours and other's
>> experience.
>> 
>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mark
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 6:30 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Dr. Alvord commenting on Ant's PhD thesis:
>>>> 
>>>> In the same paragraph, you make a good point with the quotation from 
>>>> DiSanto and Steele that the ‘enlightenment experience doesn’t depend upon 
>>>> words and concepts for its flowering.’  I tend to be ‘head-centered.’  
>>>> Quotations like this help the reader to escape the confinement of 
>>>> intellectual static patterns.
>>>> 
>>>> From your discussion of how enigmatic Zen appears to Westerners, I am 
>>>> reminded of Pirsig’s statement in LILA:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Of the two kinds of hostility to metaphysics he [Phædrus] considered the 
>>>> mystics’ hostility the more formidable.  Mystics will tell you that once 
>>>> you’ve opened the door to metaphysics you can say goodbye to any genuine 
>>>> understanding of reality.  Thought is not a path to reality.  It sets 
>>>> obstacles in that path because when you try to use thought to approach 
>>>> something that is prior to thought your thinking does not carry you toward 
>>>> that something.  It carries you away from it.  To define something is to 
>>>> subordinate it to a tangle of intellectual relationships.  And when you do 
>>>> that you destroy real understanding. (1991, p.66)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Page 52, Pirsig’s 2000e e-mail to Anthony: ‘For scientists, the mind of 
>>>> the Buddha and the Mind of God are usually the same, even though the 
>>>> Buddha was an atheist.  I think it is extremely important to emphasize 
>>>> that the MOQ is pure empiricism.  There is nothing supernatural in it.’  
>>>> Compare this, later in the thesis, with Northrop’s ‘concepts by intuition’.
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to