"To the extent that one's behavior is
controlled by static patterns of quality it is without choice. But to the
extent
that one follows Dynamic Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is
free."
(LILA, Chapter 12)
Here's a way to look at it: 'To the extent that one's behavior is controlled
by the freewill (a static pattern of value) it is without choice. But to the
extent that one follows Dynamic Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior
is free.'
But there is also this:
"In a subject-object classification of the world, Quality is in the same
situation as that platypus. Because they can't classify it the experts have
claimed there is something wrong with it. And Quality isn't the only such
platypus. Subject-object metaphysics is characterized by herds of huge,
dominating, monster platypi. The problems of free will versus determinism, of
the relation of mind to matter, of the discontinuity of matter at the
sub-atomic level, of the apparent purposelessness of the universe and the life
within it are all monster platypi created by the subject-object metaphysics..."
(LILA, Chapter 8)
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
