J-A to Marsha:
The Buddhists however, say that the source of patterns is ignorance, whereas the MOQ says
the source of the patterns is the "nothingness" of Dynamic Quality.
When it is said that the static patterns arise from Dynamic Quality the
non-dualistic view of the world so characteristic of Buddhism is preserved.
The MOQ says, as does Buddhism, that the best place on the wheel of
karma is the hub and not the rim where one is thrown about by the
gyration of everyday life.
J-A concludes:
I just would like to say that I think it is useless, of no value, no quality at
all, to equate DQ and SQ.
Andre:
And what is Marsha's response,(so characteristic)?: So what? That was 1996.
What an absolutely brilliant response!
Confusing a photo of the scenery with the actual scenery. The map with the
territory. The menu with the food. The MOQ with experience (DQ), (as Bodvar
claimed).
Marsha to J-A:
I have every right, though, to pursue the connections.
Andre:
Yes you have that right. The connections, or not, are for you to explore and
persue. But do you have to bother us with your soliloquize of quest? I mean,
you don't give a shit about anything or anybody one way or another. You are
just (ab)using this discuss (and the various contributors who really care) to
satisfy your own adolescent misgivings.
If you try to find the conflation of DQ/sq, I can tell you now that you will
not! Unless you keep on deceiving yourself...of which I have no doubt.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
