Hi Joseph -
Sorry for the long delay in answering - am email swamped and had to let this
thread languish.
Emotions are DQ only.
But they can leave SQ traces, I think, as in art-structures. And memory too.
Isn't ZAMM a genuine *memoir*? Makes me think of Walter Pater: "To burn
always with this hard, gem-like flame..." - Quite a thing he did there,
making the flame hard and crystalline. Heraclitus would have a word with
him.
I am not aware that the expressions for these passions will use DQ/SQ in
the same way by each individual at an intellectual level.
I just can't help feel that at some other level, there has to be more of a
fusion. The living moment surely has both, and more. In fact, the living
moment came first. Maybe I'm coming at all of this from an inductive
direction? I'm a naughty emo-Aristotelian, but I think it can all work out.
It takes a bit of self-study and a lot of practice to even be certain of
what I am trying express, let alone whether I have chosen the right words.
Thanks for giving that look inside. Reminds me of the difficult I've talked
to some folks who like Korzybski about - trying to speak in E-Prime.
MRB
http://www.fuguewriter.com
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
