Hi, Ian Glendinning -
Michael (whoever you are)
I kinda wonder that a lot, and not at all, myself. It's interesting to
wander around.
Almost every discussion of Pirsig, the totality of his thought, and the
MOQ
(all three of which are separate) that I've seen eventually resemble the
Church of Reason intellectualizing criticized so adeptly in ZAMM.
I don't interact with many of the interminable academic arguments these
days
A lot of it seems to be about niceties of classification, and I wonder where
it goes. Maybe it's just a natural function, like a tree making leaves (or,
as Alan Watts would have it, "leaving")?
those on the "reason" trip will eventually grow out of it.
As I've said elsewhere in a different way, perhaps Bob is reason's subtlest
trickster. Getting that indefinability in at the root is pretty tricksy. It
always makes me see a Planck length-time - can't get your pincers in it
without ruining it. : )
MRB
http://www.fuguewriter.com
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
