Dan said to Ron and all:
If I understand correctly, Dynamic Quality is free of expectation. It is the
new moment freshly dawning, pure experience, no reflection, no static quality
entrapments. To ponder on what could have been is a reflection... it isn't real
experience. It is an illusion of what is real. To suppose by changing one's
actions one can change the outcome is a powerful tool but only by looking
forward, not looking back.
dmb says:
I think that's right. In the MOQ, freedom means being attuned and responsive to
the immediate flux of life while reflection is a matter of conceptual sorting
and sifting after the empirical fact. The MOQ's position isn't going to be
illuminated by demanding past conditionals that depend on rewinding the causal
chain in some thought experiment. I think Steve has only shown that he's
totally confused as to the fundamentals of the MOQ. I mean, he's relying on the
MOQ's sworn enemies to explain the MOQ. It's like using the KKK to explain what
the NAACP is all about. That only works if you're trying to show, by example,
exactly what it's NOT.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
