On Sep 21, 2011, at 3:33 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > Steve, DMB, > > I see you two are still going at it. > > Most people these days would surely include the freedoms of statistical > chance events as part of the "determinism" half of this debate ? > (determinism with probabilities) > And the "could do / have done different" and "being responsible" moral angle > of choice on the "free-will" side in human affairs. > > Of course Pirsig give's us a moral metaphor for all events right down to the > fundamental physical processes, but that doesn't stop us distinguishing > between these two kinds of "morality". > > I'm left with "What's your point?" Steve. > Ian >
Hi Ian, I wondered if anyone would consider the point-of-view of both RMP and Nagarjuna that there are two kinds of truths. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
