> dmb says: > My claim is that Steve is misreading James. The quotes provide evidence for > that claim. Steve says that James's indeterminism is a kind of determinism > but the evidence shows that James's indeterminism is meant to oppose > determinism. The quotes provide evidence that Steve is misusing these terms > and that he has misunderstood the meaning of James's essay. He brought it up, > by the way, not realizing that this essay does not support his position at > all. Quite the opposite.
Steve: You are misreading Steve in your claim that Steve is misreading James. All Steve was saying was what Ian just said--that in light of quantum mechanics... "Most people these days would surely include the freedoms of statistical chance events as part of the "determinism" half of this debate ? (determinism with probabilities)" "Chance" isn't the sort of freedom that anyone wants as "free will." Would you agree? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
