[Marsha]
My questioning 'essay' was more in the nature of it being an analytical
composition, which seems more intent on providing meaning, but I could
be wrong. I do agree with the comments on ZAMM.
[Arlo]
Analytical composition can be art, indeed SHOULD be art. No? Anyway,
your other comment...
[Marsha]
They beckon one into a labyrinth of every-changing discovery.
[Arlo]
I think this is good. Unless I am misreading, I like that this captures
the interaction between, say, the painting and the person who
experiences it. 'Meaning' is not (in this view) 'transmissive' in that
the viewer is entirely passive (objective), nor is it constructed
entirely on the whim of the viewer (subjective), but 'meaning' (art)
evolves out of the the experience/interaction of the 'painting'/'viewer'.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
