Hi Matt and All, DQ/SQ! In a logical environment DQ is different from SQ! SQ is defined and DQ participates in that definition, malleable while maintaining its indefinable status. In the environment MOQ, conceptual reality includes both: How can the undefined be a lower level than the defined when it is necessary and precedes any definition in being indefinable yet used for definition of the later level, necessary to the definition? E.g. Intellect DQ/SQ is a higher level in evolution than emotions DQ only?
Joe On 10/23/11 3:58 PM, "Matt Kundert" <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt: > Okay, but what do you do with what I think is a correct perception > of Pirsig that Pirsig also wants to say that we are never > disconnected from DQ? You elaborated well the one side of Pirsig > that suggests that SOM is in an important sense between us and DQ > (via the glasses analogy), but what do you do with the notion that > one of Pirsig's first metaphysical moves is to collapse the (SOM) > distinction between experience and reality, in order to say that we > are never, actually, out of touch with reality, even if we had thought > we were (again, via the glasses analogy--reality was always there, > even if we thought it was blue, and not the better color, green). > Isn't there a sense in which Pirsig is suggesting that SOM's > problems are fake, illusions, rice-traps we stumbled into? Or is > that one of the things you count as a misinterpretation? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
