Hello everyone On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:55 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > I have to agree with you that often posts in response lack quality. What I > understood from Ron (which I believe he confirmed, I think) was that your > conversation was getting very difficult to follow, and perhaps somewhat > circular. As far as I can tell, typically you hold your own with the > armchair metaphysicians. My training in formal philosophy is meager, but I > must say that I have learned much from reading threads, and trying to > contribute in my own spacey way
Dan: I understand... I know my posts are difficult to follow... they're even more difficult to formulate and to write. I'm not a philosopher. I have no formal training. I'm probably wrong in most of what I say. And I appreciate the opportunity to discuss these issues with folk like Matt, dmb, Ham, Andre, Steve Peterson, you, and others. I learn much. Ron has been around a long time and I expect better from him than to jump into a discussion without properly arguing a point. He attacked me with innuendo and slandered my post without saying why. And the only thing he confirmed was that he was being a dick. Apologies my arse... If my contributions seem circular, they are. Many times I go back over certain areas to make a point both to others and to myself. I don't know how else to do it. Thank you, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
