Mark, 

Easier to obscure the quote than to consider it seriously.   Right.  I've got 
it...   


Marsha 


On Nov 17, 2011, at 12:54 PM, 118 wrote:

> Dear Alan (spokes person, Marsha),
> 
> There is a condition known as Cortical Blindness.  This is presented as the 
> inability to form visual images in the visual cortex.  Such a thing can arise 
> from brain injury.  This would argue that images ARE formed within the brain. 
>  Perhaps you are using "visual images" in a different way.  Please be so kind 
> as to explain.
> 
> If you, Alan, wish to contribute to MoQ, you also agree to engage in 
> explanations of your statements.  Otherwise it is just dogma that a 
> discussion forum has no use for.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 1:13 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Nov 16, 2011, at 6:42 PM, david buchanan wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Matt said to Dan:
>>> You've been taking "Don's dog dish" as an made-up, fictional account--is 
>>> that right?  And _that's_ why "what dish" makes sense?   ...It had suddenly 
>>> occurred to me, because of the lilt of some of your comments to me and to 
>>> Dave, that you were basing the usage of "imaginary" on the fact that I 
>>> "made up" the example, as in: I have no friends by these names, so it is an 
>>> imaginary example.  ...  I still don't know whether you think it is 
>>> important or not that some cases are anecdotal and some made up whole 
>>> cloth; some are reportings of experience, some are thought-experiments.  
>>> That's what I was trying to suss out last time.
>>> 
>>> dmb says:
>>> Right. The tree in the forest is a classic thought experiment and nobody 
>>> ever asks which forest or what kind of tree, let alone a specific and 
>>> particular tree that Don's dog pees upon. I mean, I took "Don's dog dish" 
>>> to be a concrete and particular experience (although trivial) but I take 
>>> the tree that no one's around to hear as a hypothetical fiction, as an 
>>> abstract tree of no particular type and one described in terms of being 
>>> part of nobody's experience when it falls. Concrete and abstract are very 
>>> important categories when discussing empirical reasons. I'd even say that 
>>> no real conversation is going to occur until that is ironed out. 
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Can you consider this when discussing empirical reasons:
>> 
>>  "Philosophers and scientists have long recognized the illusory nature of 
>> perceptual appearance. When we observe the world around us, we see images, 
>> such as shapes and colors, that lack physical attributes.  The visual image 
>> of the color red, for instance, doesn't have any mass or atomic structure.  
>> It isn't located in the external world, for it arises partly in dependence 
>> upon our visual sense faculty, including the eye, the optic nerve, the 
>> visual cortex.  There are clearly brain functions that contribute to the 
>> generation of red images, but no evidence that those neural correlates of 
>> perception are actually _identical_ to those images.  So there is no 
>> compelling reason to believe that the images are located inside our heads.  
>> Since visual images, or qualia, are not located either outside or inside our 
>> heads, they don't seem to have any spatial location at all.  The same is 
>> true of all other kinds of sensory qualia, including sounds, smells, tastes, 
>> and tactile sensation
> s
>> ."
>> 
>>   (Wallace, B. Alan, 'Hidden Dimensions: The Unification of Physics and 
>> Consciousness',p.50) 
>> 
>> Seems to me both "concrete" and "abstract" are patterns abstracted from the 
>> pure experience.  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to