Mark, On Nov 17, 2011, at 5:51 PM, 118 wrote: > Clearly Wallace is not a Buddhist, that I CAN tell you.
You had stated the Alan Wallace was not a Buddhist. That is all I was addressing when I posted that he was ordaining by the Dalai Lama. Marsha On Nov 20, 2011, at 11:49 AM, 118 wrote: > Marsha, > You were interpreting the facts, and then using such interpretation to > promote your use of Wallace quotes. Your interpretation was indeed a leap. > You are presenting words from a page that you read (Wallace's ordination) as > something more than what they are. What difference does it make if he were > Muslim or Buddhist? You are stuck in your classifications of Quality. > Breathe out. > > Mark > > On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:21 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Mark, >> >> On Nov 20, 2011, at 1:58 AM, 118 wrote: >> >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> I think I will jump in here to possibly clear up any misunderstanding. >>> The comments I posted concerning my degree and what it made me were >>> in response to Marsha's claim that since Wallace had a biography which >>> included a luminary it made him completely believable. >> >> >> Marsha: >> I made no such leap. I just pointed out the facts. Maybe the Dalai Lama >> ordaining Wallace makes him a Muslim from your point-of-view. >> >> >> Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
