Marsha, You were interpreting the facts, and then using such interpretation to promote your use of Wallace quotes. Your interpretation was indeed a leap. You are presenting words from a page that you read (Wallace's ordination) as something more than what they are. What difference does it make if he were Muslim or Buddhist? You are stuck in your classifications of Quality. Breathe out.
Mark On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:21 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mark, > > On Nov 20, 2011, at 1:58 AM, 118 wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> I think I will jump in here to possibly clear up any misunderstanding. >> The comments I posted concerning my degree and what it made me were >> in response to Marsha's claim that since Wallace had a biography which >> included a luminary it made him completely believable. > > > Marsha: > I made no such leap. I just pointed out the facts. Maybe the Dalai Lama > ordaining Wallace makes him a Muslim from your point-of-view. > > > Marsha > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
