Hi Mark and all, Yeah!
Joe On 11/23/11 4:25 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, > Yes, Quality is more like music than an edifice. We have some > convinced that Quality has the four walls of inorganic, biological, > social, and intellectual, when in actuality it can equally be > considered as a symphony. We have some that take the division of > dynamic and static literally, and then perform an Aristotelian > break-down of these components seeking truth. Put enough words > together, and it will give the appearance of truth. And taking it as > such we get completely stuck. There is no music on a page of paper. > We do not create a building out of music. We do not project music out > or backward to make it sensible. We just enjoy it. > > Comparing things is simply comparing things. It assumes that such > comparison is a valid presentation of Quality. I love my children. > What do I compare that to so as to make it real in a relativistic > world, not loving them? Do I need to measure the love so as to place > it in reality? I create music using Garageband on my Mac. How do I > compare the act of creation? Is it to lack of creation? Do I > consider one act of creation relative to another? Do I give one > occurrence a "10" and another a "2"? I like the color blue, but > relative to what? Not liking the color blue? My liking of the color > red? So, blue becomes better relative to red, what exactly does that > say? It is a preference, wow imagine that. I try to do things the > best I can, not because of some relative notion, but because I want > to. What is "best"? Well the relativist would say that it is better > than "not so best". What a snarly idea! > > Betty Botter bought a bit of butter. > The butter Betty Botter bought was a bit bitter > And made her batter bitter. > But a bit of better butter > Makes better batter. > So Betty Botter bought a bit of better butter, > Making Betty Botter's bitter batter better. > > Arghh! I've got callouses on my lips! > > Cheers, > Mark > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Mark and All, >> >> Communication follows definition. Definition follows evolution. >> Individuality follows definition. Comparing things highlights communication >> of individuality. >> >> Given an evolutionary schema of 7 levels like a musical scale, or color >> spectrum, comparison can be a pleasing symphony, evolution, or a horrible >> discord, conceptualized opinion beyond a perception of reality, imho. >> >> Joe >> >> >> On 11/23/11 12:41 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So, let me ask you a different question: >>> What is it deep down inside you (and possibly many others) that causes >>> you to want to compare everything? >>> >>> No, not a trick question, a question requesting understanding on my >>> part. Relativism is only one way of looking at things, imo. >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
