On Nov 27, 2011, at 4:55 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2011, at 3:45 PM, 118 wrote:
>
>> Hi Marsha,
>> I suspected you would come in with the Einstein analogy, its fully
>> googleable ("Great Googly Moogly" as Zappa once said). That is why I
>> used the phraseology that I did.
>
>> Mark:
>> Still, I did not determine your reply.
>
> Marsha:
> You have lots to say. Got any proof?
>
>
>> Mark:
>> Yes, Einstein tried to put Quality under the laws of physics. Quality
>> is not deterministic it is based on free will, all the way from us to
>> the photon. It is not based on chance, we do not throw the dice in
>> life. But, you already know that, I think.
>
> Marsha:
> Quality may be compared to quantum theory's non-locality. Static quality
> exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns. Patterns have no
> independent existence. No hidden variables, only Quality.
>
>
>> Mark:
>> Are you saying that Bell trumps Einstein, or did you just get the
>> quote from an "I'm feeling lucky" search? Well, Marsha, are you
>> feeling lucky? I am curious why you think that Bell's work created
>> failure for Einstein. If you place a quote, you are bound to be asked
>> questions about it. Perhaps it was just mindless (deterministic)
>> posting. Only you can tell me.
>
> Marsha:
> I'll let you dynamically auto-write your own replay so you can address
> anything that comes to your mind. That's your normal mode isn't it?
>
>
> Marsha
>
Mark,
Please, by all means, feel free to think as poorly of my posts as I think of
yours.
Marsha
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
