Hi Andre, As I wrote to you yesterday, both Dynamic Quality and Sunyata, are nondualistic and, therefore, tricky to discuss. If it gives you importance to try to point out the tangle of intellectual relationships, three cheers for you.
Marsha Sent from my iPad On Dec 17, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > Marsha to Mark: > > So I find it worth considering what the Buddhist's have to say about > Emptiness, and what this particular presentation says about the importance of > realizing Emptiness, or Dynamic Quality. I find it a very thoughtful > presentation. > > Andre: > Hi Marsha, Mark. First of all 'the Buddhists' have nothing to say about > 'Emptiness' because there isn't anything to say about it. The closest one > gets is 'light' or 'freedom' or 'within which there is great working'. Read > all the first person accounts of the saints and sages over the years, read > Pirsig and you will not find anything on the content of Quality, Nothingness, > Emptiness, Tao, Buddha mind, Big Self...not one thing...of course not. There > is nothing to say about it. > > The idea of 'realizing Emptiness' is a different notion and practice. All the > perennial philosophers agree that it is here right now, closer to you than > you are to your self! Quite a claim and quite a promise which isn't a pro > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
