Hi Joseph, > DQ is a metaphysical term, indefinable in levels in existence, evolution. > DQ is not non-existent. Behavior follows existence DQ/SQ. Emotions are DQ. > >
This is contrary to what Pirsig has claimed: "As I understand it the term “emotivism” is a way of reducing all value to biology, thus making it a part of the SOM universe. The MOQ sees emotions as a biological response to quality and not the same thing as quality. There are many cases, particularly in economic activity where values occur without any emotion." - LC Why do you see value in reducing the MOQ to an emotional response? Furthermore, why do you see value in defining the undefinable DQ as 'emotions'? -David. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
