Hi Dan,

Much of my reasoning is based on a statement within the MoQ Textbook "‘Static 
quality’ refers to anything that can be conceptualised and is a synonym for the 
conditioned in Buddhist philosophy."  This points to the fact that static 
patterns in every level has a relationship with the conceptualization (as 
thinking, thoughts, ideas) process.


Marsha



On Mar 10, 2012, at 3:13 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Hello Dan,
> 
> I think it best to consider static patterns of value from two different 
> points-of-view. The first would be the nature of all patterns:  conditionally 
> co-dependent, impermanent, ever-changing and conceptualized.  The process of 
> conceptualization would pertain to all patterns (ideas/language).
> 
> The second point-of-view would be categorization by evolutionary function 
> into their four-level, hierarchical structure: inorganic, biological, social 
> and intellectual.  Then intellectual static patterns of value are a 
> particular category of pattern that began to emerge with the ancient Greeks 
> and functions in a particular manner:  mathematics, philosophy, science, etc. 
>  
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 10, 2012, at 2:39 AM, Dan Glover <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello everyone
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:17 AM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrot
>>> Hi Craig,
>>> 
>>> How do you know that? It is known through experience yes, but what you are 
>>> communicating to me now are ideas, not experience. It is only, our unique 
>>> human minds which can recognise these patterns.  This is in line with 
>>> Pirsig's quote that it is ideas which create what we know as inorganic 
>>> patterns.
>>> 
>>> "The MOQ says that Quality comes first, which produces ideas, which produce 
>>> what we know as matter." - Lila's Child.
>> 
>> Dan:
>> Yes, David... this seems right. Robert Pirsig is reiterating here what
>> he says in LILA concerning the foundations of his metaphysics:
>> 
>> "Because Quality is morality. Make no mistake about it. They're
>> identical. And if Quality is the primary reality of the world then
>> that means morality is also the primary reality of the world. The
>> world is primarily a moral order. But it's a moral order that neither
>> Rigel nor the posing Victorians had ever, in their wildest dreams,
>> thought about or heard about.
>> 
>> "The idea that the world is composed of nothing but moral value sounds
>> impossible at first. Only objects are supposed to be real. "Quality"
>> is supposed to be just a vague fringe word that tells what we think
>> about objects. The whole idea that Quality can create objects seems
>> very wrong. But we see subjects and objects as reality for the same
>> reason we see the world right-side up although the lenses of our eyes
>> actually present it to our brains upside down. We get so used to
>> certain patterns of interpretation we forget the patterns are there."
>> [LILA, chapter 8]
>> 
>> Dan comments:
>> I think the key words here are 'patterns of interpretation' which
>> would seem to correspond to ideas... the idea that objects are real is
>> a high quality idea. But when we interpret reality in that way, we
>> forget that we are working with an idea... not with reality itself. We
>> are using lens like the ones in our eyes that we forget about.
>> 
>> Iron filings do not 'recognize' magnets... iron filings exhibit a
>> preference. We (as human beings) create intellectual patterns (ideas)
>> to recognize those preferences. Predators do not recognize patterns of
>> prey... they exhibit preferences. We create intellectual patterns
>> (ideas) to recognize those preferences. Ideas produce patterns to the
>> value that makes up reality.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> http://www.danglover.com
>> 
>> 
>>> -David.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Saturday, 10 March 2012 at 4:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> 
>>>> [David]
>>>>> The reason we call them this is because they are only ever recognised as 
>>>>> patterns *because*
>>>>> of our intellect. They only exist *because* of our intellect.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I don't think this is Pirsig's view. Inorganic patterns (iron filings) 
>>>> recognize other inorganic
>>>> patterns (magnets); biological patterns (predators) recognize the patterns 
>>>> of their prey.
>>>> Craig
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to