Andre,
But of course I have not changed my opinion; the “self” is a flow of ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent, impermanent and conceptualized static patterns of inorganic, biological, social and intellectual value in the infinite field of Dynamic Quality. Please don't be frustrated, Andre, it might be detrimental to your peace-of-mind. Marsha On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > Marsha to Andre: > > I've never found your sighing, whining, impatience, name-dropping or > reference to snot-buckets significant. > > Andre: > Then why bring it up now? Again you are not disputing what I say. I am only > suggesting that with your youtube, quotes re Buddhism and > more-questions-to-answers responses to people's posts you may make clear > exactly how they may broaden/deepen our understanding of the MOQ. Also, it > may be an idea to let us know when you have changed your opinion about > something. This would clear up a lot of the frustration felt in the past. > Unless of course you stick to your ever changing present self idea and go > where and when the wind blows. I call that opportunism > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
