Hi John, Not sure what your problem might be, and not sure that I have any dominion over what you find problematic. I'm pretty much at ease with indeterminate, and depend on the provisional (static) like most everybody else.
Marsha On Mar 23, 2012, at 5:59 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Thanks, Marsha, for your usual graciousness to me and I think you did a fine > job expostulating the idea we find in the following passage. But ... > > >> . This means that any concept or term is fundamentally indeterminate, >> imprecise and, as time passes, increasingly less useful." >> >> (MoQ Textbook) > > Is still, at core, wrong-minded and fallacious. I thought it was your quote > but if it was Pirsig's, to be fair, I gotta stick to my guns. > > To my insight, the equivocation of "indeterminate" and "less useful" is > problematic. No matter who said it. > > Got a problem with that ? :-) > > Glad to talk to you again , > As always, > > John > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
