Hi Joe,

It was "nature red in tooth and claw" kind-of stuff and, yes, he might have 
been a grumbler.  I am not, at least not normally, to any great extent, but 
sometimes.  It doesn't sound like you are either, but the 'dark night of the 
soul' is not uncommon for people digging deeper into the nature of reality.  I 
still had on my mind your use of the word 'trepidation'.  Suffering is 
suffering.  Sadness is sadness.  Unfulfilled expectations are unfulfilled 
expecations.  The comments presented by Magee that represent Schopenhauer's 
attitude were very depressing, though he stressed Schopenhauer's philosophy (an 
updated Kantian transcendental idealism) were separate from his pessimism.  

Dark night stuff cannot be very pleasant and I wonder if it might help to make 
it a topic.  It is a common experience in many of the strains of perennial 
philosophy.  Or maybe just doing some reading on the subject can help.
 
There are similarities between Schopenhauer's chosen word  _Will_ and RMP's 
Quality.  Schopenhauser had a meaning for it that was outside normal 
definitions.  It represented the noumenon and was unknowable.  His 
_Vorstellung_, translated as representations, sounds like static patterns, kind 
of, but he is not around to ask for clarification.

For those who might want to run to Wikipedia for some information, Magee has 
suggested that Schopenhauer has been mostly misrepresented by many philosophers 
too lazy to figure it out for themselves.  They have his philosophy tagged as 
"transcendental idealism" and simply dismiss it.     But Nietzsche and 
Wittgenstein both were Schopenhauerian and so was Erwin Schrodinger.



Marsha


p.s.  The book has the spelling Schopenhauer; I do not know what you mean by 
emphasizing (aurer)?   
 
 

 
On Jun 18, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV and All,
> 
> I can't figure why Schopenh(aurer) would grumble about his intellect?  He
> must have heard Parrots howling!
> 
> The timeless value of DQ/SQ metaphysics manifested after his time so how
> could he feel led into error?  Maybe he was just a grumbler.
> 
> Joe M(aurer)
> 
> 
> On 6/18/12 2:23 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> It probably doesn't help that I started reading Bryan Magee's book 'The
>> Philosophy of Schopenhauer', but I think it's an unavoidable step regardless;
>> "It is almost, grumbles Schopenhauer, 'as if our intellect were intentionally
>> designed to lead us into error'."
>> 
>> http://lawsview.typepad.com/beingbuddhist/dark_night/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to