Hi Mark, ?
On 7/6/12 10:24 AM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > My point was that viewing existence through the primary concept of Value > may not be of value for everyone. Christianity, Buddism, Islam, > Existentialism, Science, are also not for everybody. MoQ provides a > different paradigm with which to view reality. Many are content with the > manner in which they view such reality. That is all that I meant. > > One cannot derive an awareness of the world as Value by simply reading > about it. This reading is an SOM approach to understanding and will not > get one to a non-SOM way of getting it. If one uses science as the true > means for deriving a relationship with existence, one misses much else that > can possibly provide meaning, Quality being one such possibility. Pirsig > goes to great lengths to describe Quality through his introduction of MoQ. > However, what he provides is not in the words he writes, but in what his > intentions are with the words. > > I am glad that you see Quality as a term for everything, and that it has > changed your life. Not everybody will see it this way. Physics is also a > metaphysics since it attempts to describe What Is. Unfortunately it only > relies on the measurable. This measurable is an SQ that we have created. > It is part of the Church of reason. MoQ goes beyond reason and gives one > an opportunity to begin to see things differently. There are some > instructions, but it is what each person does with those instructions that > is important. We learn how to drive through instructions. However, > driving is much more than those instructions. They just help one get > started. > > Cheers, > Mark > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Mark and all, >> >> You state Quality is not for everyone who qualifies? Metaphysics formats >> physics, and I would say that gravity is for everyone on a planet, physics. >> Metaphysics accepts Dq/SQ replacing SOM. >> >> IMHO Quality as a metaphysical term is everything. >> >> Joe >> >> >> On 7/4/12 5:52 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Quality is not for everybody. Especially those who expect to find it >> through >>> words. >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
