Hello Joe, Why would holding static patterns as hypothetical weaken the concept any more than RMP stating:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi MarshaV and All, > > I have trouble understanding the need for the argument: Understanding static > (patterned) value as hypothetical in order to make room for additional > inquiry. Imho, That would seriously weaken the metaphysical logic for > evolution. > > Joe > > > On 8/20/12 7:16 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Understanding static (patterned) value as hypothetical acknowledges the >> incompleteness of what we know and makes room for additional inquiry with new >> possibilities; it promotes an attitude of fearless curiosity: gumption. It >> moves one away from thinking of entities as existing inherently and existing >> independent of consciousness. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
