Hi MarshaV and All, I have trouble understanding the need for the argument: Understanding static (patterned) value as hypothetical in order to make room for additional inquiry. Imho, That would seriously weaken the metaphysical logic for evolution.
Joe On 8/20/12 7:16 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > Understanding static (patterned) value as hypothetical acknowledges the > incompleteness of what we know and makes room for additional inquiry with new > possibilities; it promotes an attitude of fearless curiosity: gumption. It > moves one away from thinking of entities as existing inherently and existing > independent of consciousness. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
