Dan: > (static quality) is a memory of experience, not experience itself.
Are you using 'memory' is the usual way? Or does a metal spring, for instance, have a memory of its former shape? "I believe there are number of philosophic systems, notably Ayn Rand’s “Objectivism,” that call the “I” or “individual” the central reality." - LC I don't know who in LC said this but it is confused. For Objectivists, the I is not the "central reality". For them the I is the center of value & morality, but unlike the MoQ, they do not hold that everything is value. Dan: > So you believe there are blue objects in the world and everyone sees > these blue objects as the same. This is contradictory to what the MOQ > says about us being immersed in culture. So, is your point that there are blue objects in the world and everyone in the same culture sees these blue objects as the same? Dan: > There is nothing wrong with saying the city of Los Angeles experiences > an earthquake. We use the term experience in various ways. But when it > comes to the MOQ we should strive to be as precise as possible. So are you saying that when the city of Los Angeles experiences an earthquake, it doesn't do so in the precise MoQ sense? If so, why? Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
