Sent by DiGi from my BlackBerry® Smartphone -----Original Message----- From: MarshaV <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected]: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 02:16:46 To: [email protected]<[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] Sympathy for the Devil
Why Dr. McWatt, I used the expression 'interesting insights' not 'mystic insights'. I don't know anything about mysticism; I learned to ride a broom, not levitate. - I didn't know anything of Buddhism until a few years ago when SA (Nick) posted a few paragraphs of the Platform Sutra. And it was your references in the MoQ Textbook and your PhD dissertation that kept me on track, and of course, your initial pointing to Khoo's lecture. I am grateful. You are a good guy. Marsha p.s. I highly recommend your MoQ Textbook and PhD dissertation. Both are chocked full new information on many aspects of the MoQ. On Feb 6, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marsha, > > As I said, I'm preaching. There's far worse sins against Quality than being > all mystic about it and, of course, it was a female mystic (Sarah Vinke) who > got this MOQ show "on the road" in the first place! > > BTW, as I didn't have a narrative to worry about, I always thought my mystic > insights in the MOQ Textbook were just slightly better than Bob's in LILA. > Just don't quote his mystic insights any more. :-) > > Take care, > > Ant > > > ---------------------------------------- >> From: [email protected] >> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:29:11 -0500 > > Hi Ant, > > Be assured I will make an effort not to reference any of the Buddhist > commentary from your Textbook or PhD dissertation again. It's a shame > though, I thought you and RMP offered some interesting insight. > > Marsha > > > On Feb 6th, 2013, Ant McWatt wrote: > > Seriously, as you implied in your last response to me in the "self" thread > yesterday, both [Dynamic and static] perspectives are useful in the right > context. I just have a feeling... that the static viewpoint is the default > one in LILA and so should be the default one here. It's MOQ Discuss; not > Mystic Discuss. If you want to use the Dynamic viewpoint, the Tetralemma > (Paul Turner's adopted "baby") or whatever esoteric perpective that Scott > Roberts was going on about years ago (if I sound too dismissive of the latter > - I shouldn't be because it IS worth at least being aware of these various > perspectives), these viewpoints should be qualified before use. It help > keeps that little intellect of mine clear about what's going on; which > metaphorical trees are where and in which metaphysical or mystical forest. > (And on and on and on...) > > > . > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
