Hi Ant,
On Feb 5, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, what I'm trying to do here (rather badly it seems) is to clarify these
> two perspectives. From what I was reading in this thread - and
> elsewhere - David Buchanan takes the conventional static perspective of the
> MOQ (as laid out in LILA) while Marsha tends to take a Dynamic
> "World of Buddhas" perspective. As I said above, by not qualifying the
> latter perspective, it confuses things and results in people
> talking over each other; sometimes even being a little rude and frustrated.
Hmmmm.
"I conclude by making a case that James and Pirsig are offering an empirically
based form of philosophical mysticism that is comparable to a non-theistic
religion like Buddhism."
(dmb)
Really?
Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
