p.p.s. The mundane is the Mystical; the Mystical is the mundane. Hahahah...
On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:16 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why Dr. McWatt, I used the expression 'interesting insights' not 'mystic > insights'. I don't know anything about mysticism; I learned to ride a broom, > not levitate. - I didn't know anything of Buddhism until a few years ago > when SA (Nick) posted a few paragraphs of the Platform Sutra. And it was > your references in the MoQ Textbook and your PhD dissertation that kept me on > track, and of course, your initial pointing to Khoo's lecture. I am > grateful. You are a good guy. > > Marsha > > > p.s. I highly recommend your MoQ Textbook and PhD dissertation. Both are > chocked full new information on many aspects of the MoQ. > > > > > On Feb 6, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Marsha, >> >> As I said, I'm preaching. There's far worse sins against Quality than being >> all mystic about it and, of course, it was a female mystic (Sarah Vinke) who >> got this MOQ show "on the road" in the first place! >> >> BTW, as I didn't have a narrative to worry about, I always thought my mystic >> insights in the MOQ Textbook were just slightly better than Bob's in LILA. >> Just don't quote his mystic insights any more. :-) >> >> Take care, >> >> Ant >> >> >> ---------------------------------------- >>> From: [email protected] >>> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:29:11 -0500 >> >> Hi Ant, >> >> Be assured I will make an effort not to reference any of the Buddhist >> commentary from your Textbook or PhD dissertation again. It's a shame >> though, I thought you and RMP offered some interesting insight. >> >> Marsha >> >> >> On Feb 6th, 2013, Ant McWatt wrote: >> >> Seriously, as you implied in your last response to me in the "self" thread >> yesterday, both [Dynamic and static] perspectives are useful in the right >> context. I just have a feeling... that the static viewpoint is the default >> one in LILA and so should be the default one here. It's MOQ Discuss; not >> Mystic Discuss. If you want to use the Dynamic viewpoint, the Tetralemma >> (Paul Turner's adopted "baby") or whatever esoteric perpective that Scott >> Roberts was going on about years ago (if I sound too dismissive of the >> latter - I shouldn't be because it IS worth at least being aware of these >> various perspectives), these viewpoints should be qualified before use. It >> help keeps that little intellect of mine clear about what's going on; which >> metaphorical trees are where and in which metaphysical or mystical forest. >> (And on and on and on...) >> >> >> . > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
