Hi David (and Dan)
This statement kind of jumped out at me when I read it as it's an
incorrect statement - the first part should read:
"That which has no value doesn't exist"
which I think is what Pirsig said quite some time back.
SQ derives from DQ and has value - static value! So even if SQ isn't
experienced in the same sense as DQ it still exists as static patterns
of value.
Horse
On 05/03/2013 08:53, Dan Glover wrote:
That which isn't experienced doesn't exist. sq isn't ultimately experienced so
it doesn't exist.
--
"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines
or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
