Hi Marsha V and All, In SOM metaphysics the theory of how we know things is the mind's ability to abstract the essence of an object and give it intentional existence in the intellect for communication by words.
The theory of knowledge of MOQ is direct experience. I experience DQ, indefinable! I experience SQ definable. Words delineating experience like DQ are indefinable not patterns. Emotions are indefinable and I suggest the base for the reality of DQ is indefinable emotion. On 3/29/13 3:33 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I observe a value in the definition of perception (individual) as different >> from the definition of the conception of creation or evolution. > > If I am absorbed in talking to myself, I will not recognize the taste of > ginger, or the smell of earth after rain, or the feel of the breeze passing > over my cheek, or the sound of birdsong, or the sight of dancing leaves. > These too are patterns to be notice; patterns that are far more immediate than > the abstracted chatter and patterns that say much more about our relationship > to the world of value. Remember your breath: I am breathing in, I am > breathing out... > > > Marsha > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
