Hi Joe and Antony and everybody else you got me there Joe :-D I am just, like many philosophhers, a theoretical system/map builder, I was just speaking from my baudrillard map point of view.
But what is reality? From my point of view does the immaginairy information I experience as real(my consciousness) only exist in my mind as a immaginairy information difference between what I already subjectively am and what I objectively encounter every moment. Thats the reason why I resonate with my surrounding world in just a limited way. It's our purpose to resonate more because that increases our sensational experiences. That's our will or driving force so to speak. How I understand these increasing or decreasing sensations as information is completely relative to what I already am. Eddo 2013/4/2 Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> > Hi Eddo Rats, > > How can a moment be theoretical? If a moment is imaginary it can be > described as an indefinable reality of infinite possibilities. If the > moment is real it is existing reality. > > Joe > > > On 4/1/13 2:33 PM, "Eddo Rats" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > joe, > > > > every moment now is theoretical a moment of infinite possibillities. for > > some part we trust to know what to expect. I would call that SQ the other > > part that we can't trust is DQ. and of course are the things we least > > expect to happen the most emotional. > > > > Eddo > > > > > > 2013/4/1 Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> > > > >> Hi Eddo Rats, > >> > >> Welcome. I am not a mathematician. I appreciate that "Mathematically > >> approachable" is a description for rigid logic. > >> > >> DQ is indefinable. I have to tweak my consciousness to try to find > >> something in myself which validates a perception of the indefinable. I > >> cannot define Love. I accept Love to represent an intensity of > indefinable > >> DQ. > >> > >> Joe > >> > >> > >> On 3/31/13 2:26 PM, "Eddo Rats" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> My definition of quality is: Quality represents "That" where I can > >>> identify > >> with. > >> The trick in understanding this definition is in the two > >>> dimensional > >> character of the word "Identification". > >> You can Identify a "What" > >>> and you can Identify "With" > >> "What" is represented by the information > >>> dimension. > >> "With" is represented by the sensation (emotion?) dimension. > >> This > >>> is all Mathematicly approachable. > >> > >> > >> > >> Moq_Discuss mailing list > >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >> Archives: > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
