Joe, DQ is indeterminate. IMHO.
Marsha On Apr 1, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi MarshaV and All, > > The discussion embraces the path to knowledge without the analysis of the > theory of knowledge. The logic of mathematics, defined experience, cannot > logically validate indefinable emotions DQ/SQ. > > The SOM metaphysical suggestion of abstraction as the value of knowledge is > indefensible. Knowledge is direct experience. > > How does a theory of knowledge incorporate direct experience in definition? > Pirsig suggests that a sentient being perceives DQ/SQ. DQ is indefinable > direct experience. SQ is definable direct experience. > > The metaphysical description is DQ/SQ. The structure for experience is > DQ/SQ. What separates DQ/SQ as the description of reality? DQ is > indefinable, SQ is definable. > > Understanding MOQ, the metaphysics of describing indefinable/definable > reality, can be somewhat vague. > > DQ, indefinable, is not necessarily coupled to definable SQ in evolution! > It can stand alone, indefinable reality. DQ/SQ tweaks the theory of > knowledge to a more complex metaphysical definable/indefinable structure in > direct experience. > > IMHO Joe > > > On 4/1/13 1:04 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Joe, >> >> Directly experiencing DQ is directly realizing that there is nothing (nothing >> divisible, definable and knowable) persisting from moment to moment. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> snip... >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
