I am very fine, Thank you Jan! Like a rat in a sewer or a pig in the mud Jan said: In a scientific mode, scientists are doing research to find knowledge by using their tools and methods on objects, not upon themselves. It would look very funny with a group of astronomers pointing their mirror telescopes at each other instead of at the real stars.
True! so? what's your point? I've heard however how some scientists try substances on themselves , like LSD, Aspirin and Viagra. I would prefer to try any suspicious drug on rats first. Go ahead! be my Guest! That's where Amsterdam outside it's borders is known for am i right? Greetings Eddo One more reply to go for today 2013/4/4 Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> > How do you do Eddo? > > In a scientific mode, scientists are doing research to find knowledge by > using their tools and methods on objects, not upon themselves. It would > look very funny with a group of astronomers pointing their mirror > telescopes at each other instead of at the real stars. > > I've heard however how some scientists try substances on themselves , like > LSD, Aspirin and Viagra. I would prefer to try any suspicious drug on rats > first. > > JanAnders > > > 4 apr 2013 kl. 10.57 skrev Eddo Rats: > > > Hi David > > > > Why don't you respond to the answers i gave you? > > > > Jeez. Is this a discussion group or a psychiatric hostipal? > > > > Are you becomming political here rather than philosophical? > > > > Greetings Eddo > > > > > > 2013/4/4 ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]> > > > >> First book written in qr code entirely > >> > >> > http://deals.woot.com/deals/details/93a2090d-d655-42b1-a8fa-d59fd3401a07/free-kindle-book-written-entirely-in-qr-code-after-the-revolution-has-passed-us > >> > >> nice naming , device literature , language only as data-transfer > >> better attempt than importing math into language > >> > >> Adrie > >> > >> > >> 2013/4/4 david buchanan <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Ant McWatt said: > >>> ..I probably receive correspondence about the "new secret of the > >> universe" > >>> once every month and most of this [...] is arcane nonsense. > However, > >>> being a philosopher (rather than a philosophiologist) is - I think > >> anyway - > >>> about trying to keep an open, beginner's mind. So despite the tons of > >>> bullshit that such a mind has to go through, at least there are the > >>> occasional pearls of wisdom such as the MOQ. Moreover, reading Eddo's > >> last > >>> couple of posts, I do think there might be a little more than > "psychotic > >>> nonsense" to his ideas (i.e. his answer to Dave that he's using > >> mathematics > >>> for his philosophical system as it is the least culturally biased > >>> "language" makes some sense; at least on face value). Anyway, it will > be > >>> interesting to see how this particular converstion pans out. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> dmb says: > >>> Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference between brilliant and crazy > - > >>> but usually it's pretty damn easy. > >>> > >>> As I see it, Pirsig accomplished what he did despite his "illness", not > >>> because of it. He didn't see what he saw because he was insane but > >> because > >>> he did the work. He thought and thought and read and read for years and > >>> then he was faced with a practical problem in his professional life and > >> his > >>> solution was scrutinized by the community in which he worked and then > >> later > >>> by the "officials" at the University of Chicago. Even as he was getting > >>> himself thrown out, he thought "I'll just have to write my thesis in > some > >>> other way". And so he did. In one of the early interviews (NPR in 1974) > >> he > >>> describes ZAMM as "a dissertation embedded in a narrative". The > narrative > >>> is a powerful story of redemption to those who've suffered from mental > >>> illness, wherein madness is a divine gift and not a curse or a burden - > >>> but the dissertation stands or falls because it makes sense or it > >> doesn't. > >>> Sorry, but we don't get any extra points for the pain suffered in the > >>> production of a thesis. It's good a > >>> nd right or it's not so good and not so right. > >>> > >>> There is plenty of room to accommodate different tastes and > >> sensibilities. > >>> No reasonable person would be opposed to open-mindedness but we also > need > >>> to be discerning and sensitive to the qualities that separate good > ideas > >>> from confused or convoluted drivel. I'm not talking about formal rigor > or > >>> fancy rules. But can we not rule out the bat shit crazy, please? > >>> > >>> > >>> Jeez. Is this a discussion group or a psychiatric hostipal? > >>> > >>> > >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list > >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >>> Archives: > >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> parser > >> Moq_Discuss mailing list > >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >> Archives: > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
