Hi Adri The mathemathics i use speaks of a real and a immaginairy dimension. I use this to be able to distinguish between sensation and information. It's sort of the same distinction between denotations and connotation in your way of thinking only in a more strict manner. The reason i started thinking in the direction i did was because i wanted to understand the psychotic phenomenon. My intuition gave me a hunch to search in the direction of resonance. Being an Elektronics engineer gave me the bias of having the mathematical and physics tools in my mind which i applied to psychology. The resonance phenomenon works in several scientific disciplines; elektronics, mechanics probably more.... Why not Psychology?
I am busy in this direction for quite some time now, I even made some publications about this topic in a more primitive state back in 2005. My mathemathical aproach is far more advanced now, That's what i think anyway. Since you understand Dutch and doubt my abillity to be able to express myself in both English and Dutch I recommend you to read my Dutch publications on the topic. http://www.tijdschriftdeviant.nl/teksten/deviant45/10.pdf http://www.tijdschriftdeviant.nl/teksten/deviant49/03.pdf If you have the Energy and the convidence you can produce a better English translation, be my guest and go ahead. Greetings Eddo 2013/4/4 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > Hi David > > Why don't you respond to the answers i gave you? > > > Jeez. Is this a discussion group or a psychiatric hostipal? > > Are you becomming political here rather than philosophical? > > Greetings Eddo > > > 2013/4/4 ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]> > >> First book written in qr code entirely >> >> http://deals.woot.com/deals/details/93a2090d-d655-42b1-a8fa-d59fd3401a07/free-kindle-book-written-entirely-in-qr-code-after-the-revolution-has-passed-us >> >> nice naming , device literature , language only as data-transfer >> better attempt than importing math into language >> >> Adrie >> >> >> 2013/4/4 david buchanan <[email protected]> >> >> > Ant McWatt said: >> > ..I probably receive correspondence about the "new secret of the >> universe" >> > once every month and most of this [...] is arcane nonsense. However, >> > being a philosopher (rather than a philosophiologist) is - I think >> anyway - >> > about trying to keep an open, beginner's mind. So despite the tons of >> > bullshit that such a mind has to go through, at least there are the >> > occasional pearls of wisdom such as the MOQ. Moreover, reading Eddo's >> last >> > couple of posts, I do think there might be a little more than "psychotic >> > nonsense" to his ideas (i.e. his answer to Dave that he's using >> mathematics >> > for his philosophical system as it is the least culturally biased >> > "language" makes some sense; at least on face value). Anyway, it will >> be >> > interesting to see how this particular converstion pans out. >> > >> > >> > >> > dmb says: >> > Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference between brilliant and crazy - >> > but usually it's pretty damn easy. >> > >> > As I see it, Pirsig accomplished what he did despite his "illness", not >> > because of it. He didn't see what he saw because he was insane but >> because >> > he did the work. He thought and thought and read and read for years and >> > then he was faced with a practical problem in his professional life and >> his >> > solution was scrutinized by the community in which he worked and then >> later >> > by the "officials" at the University of Chicago. Even as he was getting >> > himself thrown out, he thought "I'll just have to write my thesis in >> some >> > other way". And so he did. In one of the early interviews (NPR in 1974) >> he >> > describes ZAMM as "a dissertation embedded in a narrative". The >> narrative >> > is a powerful story of redemption to those who've suffered from mental >> > illness, wherein madness is a divine gift and not a curse or a burden - >> > but the dissertation stands or falls because it makes sense or it >> doesn't. >> > Sorry, but we don't get any extra points for the pain suffered in the >> > production of a thesis. It's good a >> > nd right or it's not so good and not so right. >> > >> > There is plenty of room to accommodate different tastes and >> sensibilities. >> > No reasonable person would be opposed to open-mindedness but we also >> need >> > to be discerning and sensitive to the qualities that separate good ideas >> > from confused or convoluted drivel. I'm not talking about formal rigor >> or >> > fancy rules. But can we not rule out the bat shit crazy, please? >> > >> > >> > Jeez. Is this a discussion group or a psychiatric hostipal? >> > >> > >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list >> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> > Archives: >> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> parser >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
