Adrie said:
Have to agree with Dr. McWatt. Thatcher was a psychopath they really should 
fill her grave with concrete, to avoid any ressurection.


Marsha said:
Whoa...  What kind of self does the MoQ attribute to Ms. Thatcher?  Does she 
have an evil homunculus that behind the scenes called the shots for devastating 
Great Britain?


dmb says:
What? Thatcher's lack of empathy can't be criticized because she was not a 
Cartesian homunculus? Are you on acid right now, or what? That's the weakest, 
lamest defense I ever heard. It's not even relevant and think what would happen 
if we applied your "reasoning" to every political actor. 

It's about the age-old complaint against the rich and powerful. You don't have 
to take my word for it, just ask Charles Dickens. Or Robert Pirsig...


"...the conservatives who keep trumpeting about the virtues of free enterprise 
are normally just supporting their own self-interest. They are just doing the 
usual cover-up for the rich in their age-oldexploitation of the poor."

In the MOQ, 20th century political conflict is portrayed as a conflict between 
social and intellectual values - with the right-left clash being more severe in 
Europe than in the USA. 


"The gigantic power of socialism and fascism, which have overwhelmed this 
century, is explained by a conflict of levels of evolution.  This conflict 
explains the driving force behind Hitler not as an insane search for power but 
as an all-consuming glorification of social authority and hatred of 
intellectualism.  His anti-Semitism was fueled by anti-intellectualism. His 
hatred of communists was fueled by anti-intellectualism.  His exaltation of the 
German volk was fueled by it.  His fanatic persecution of any kind of 
intellectual freedom was driven by it. In the United States the economic and 
social upheaval was not so great as in Europe, but Franklin Roosevelt and the 
New Deal, nevertheless, became the center of a lesser storm between social and 
intellectual forces."



Thatcher and Reagan both represent a rightward turn against "big government", 
as Reagan called it. This was aimed against the whole tradition of New Deal 
liberalism. (It's a bit confusing but this neo-Victorian reaction is known as 
free-market conservatism or right-wing libertarianism while in England it's 
known as neo-liberalism.) In both cases, the dismantling of "the welfare state" 
entailed not only drastic financial cuts to the poor but also a rather cruel 
demonization of the recipients. Way back in 1980 when Reagan first ran for 
President, they campaigned against the so-called "Welfare Queens," the mythical 
figure who lived in luxury from her welfare checks and in the most recent 
Presidential election the Republican candidate was still campaigning against 
these same mythical "takers".

Psychopathy is a broad range of mental disorders wherein the "afflicted" lacks 
empathy. This lack ranges from mild narcissism to full-blown serial killers. 
The only place with a higher rate of psychopathy than politics and big business 
is prison. It could be literally true that Maggie was somewhere along that 
psychopathic continuum but I think that's not really the point. It's just a way 
to criticize her willingness to inflict suffering on the citizens of the UK. 
The statistic show the actual effects of these market policies, which have been 
operable for about three decades now. The rich got richer, the poor got poorer, 
and the middle class got smaller. Only one nation in the West has more of its 
children living in poverty. Heckofajob, Ronny. Thanks, Maggie. 

"...the conservatives who keep trumpeting about the virtues of free enterprise 
are normally just supporting their own self-interest. They are just doing the 
usual cover-up for the rich in their age-oldexploitation of the poor."


"That’s what neither the socialists nor the capitalists ever got figured out. 
From a static point of view, socialism is more moral than capitalism. It’s a 
higher form of evolution. It is an intellectually guided society, not just a 
society that is guided by mindless traditions. That’s what gives socialism its 
drive. But what the socialists left out and what has all but killed their whole 
undertaking is an absence of a concept of indefinite Dynamic Quality. You go to 
any socialist city and it’s always a dull placebecause there’s little Dynamic 
Quality.
On the other hand the conservatives who keep trumpeting about the virtues of 
free enterprise are normally just supporting their own self-interest. They are 
just doing the usual cover-up for the rich in their age-old exploitation of the 
poor. Some of them seem to sense there is also something mysteriously virtuous 
in a free enterprise system and you can see them struggling to put it into 
words but they don’t have the metaphysical vocabulary for it any more than the 
socialists do.
The metaphysics of Quality provides the vocabulary. A free market is a Dynamic 
institution. What people buy and what people sell, in other words what people 
value, can never be contained by any intellectual formula. What makes the 
marketplace work is Dynamic Quality. The market is alwayschanging and the 
direction of that change can never be predetermined. The Metaphysics of Quality 
says the free market makes everybody richer by preventing static economic 
patterns for setting in and stagnating economic growth. That is the reason 
major capitalist economies of the world have done so much better since World 
War II that the major socialist economies.
It is not that Victorian social economic patterns are more moral than socialist 
intellectual economic patterns. Quite the opposite. They are less moral as 
static patterns go. What makes the free-enterprise system superior is that the 
socialists, reasoning intelligently and objectively, haveinadvertently closed 
the door to Dynamic Quality in the buying and selling of things. They closed it 
because the metaphysical structure of their objectivity never told them Dynamic 
Quality exists." (Lila, chapter 17) 




                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to