dmb,

Marsha had said:
Can you read?  The subject line says 'philosophology'.  Read again what 
Annotation 133 says about philosophology and try to understand RMP's words in 
that context.  Do you understand the word 'context'?  

dmb whines and tries to change the subject:
...
... snip.   
...


Marsha now:
Don't misrepresent my post; look again at the subject line.  RMP states in 
Annotation 133 from 'LILA's Child: "... I have read that the MOQ is the same as 
Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Hegel, James, Pierce, Nietzsche, Bergson, and many 
others even though these people are not held to be saying the same as each 
other. This kind of comparison is what I have meant by the term, 
"philosophology." It is done by people who are not seeking to understand what 
is written but only to classify it so that they don't have to see it as any 
thing new.  ..."  These are RMP's words.  Perhaps you should read them again.  
RMP, in 'A brief summary of the Metaphysics of Quality', makes a similar 
statement:
 
"I also have a concern of my own. This is the concern that philosophers, 
instead of coming to grips with the philosophy at hand, sometimes dismiss it by 
saying, “Oh he is saying the same as someone else,” or “someone else has said 
it much better.” This is the latter half of the well known conservative 
argument that some new idea is (a) no good because it hasn't been heard it 
before or (b) it is no good because it has been heard before. If, as has been 
noted by R.C. Zaehner, once the Oxford University Professor of Eastern 
Religions and Ethics, I am saying the same thing as Aristotle; and if, as has 
been noted in the Harvard Educational Review, I am saying the same thing as 
William James; and if as has been noted now that I may be saying the same thing 
as Spinoza: then why has no one ever noticed that Aristotle and Spinoza and 
William James are all saying the same thing?"

And previously in the same document: 
 
"The Metaphysics of Quality's central idea that the world is nothing but value 
is not part of any philosophic tradition that I know of. I have proposed it 
because it seems to me that when you look into it carefully it makes more sense 
than all the other things the world is supposed to be composed of."  
 
 
Marsha
 
 
  
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to