On the subject of:
"Strictly speaking, the creation of any metaphysics is an immoral act since
it's a lower form of evolution, intellect, trying to devour a higher mystic
one. The same thing that's wrong with philosophology when it tries to control
and devour philosophy is wrong with metaphysics when it tries to devour the
world intellectually. It attempts to capture the Dynamic within a static
pattern. But it never does. You never get it right. So why try? It's like
trying to construct a perfect unassailable chess game. No matter how smart you
are you're never going to play a game that is 'right' for all people at all
times, everywhere. Answers to ten questions led to a hundred more and answers
to those led to a thousand more. Not only would he never get it right; the
longer he worked on it the wronger it would probably get."
(RMP, 'LILA', Chapter 32)
On May 23, 2013, at 9:36 AM, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:
> dmb:
> But Marsha misconstrues this to mean that it's immoral to define words and
> ideas, to mean that any kind of philosophical discussion is some sort of
> moral violation.
Marsha:
Never thought this, never said this and never wrote this. Sorry, dmb, but this
interpretation of my thoughts on the matter is your own invention and says more
about you than me.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
