Hi MarshaV and All, Experience is too vague to support evolution DQ/SQ. Both DQ and SQ are meaningful metaphysical terms dynamic quality indefinable and static quality definable.
Joe On 5/23/13 1:21 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > Don't you think that Quality as experience is better than noun or adjective? > > > Marsha > > > > On May 23, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi MarshaV and All, >> >> Is Quality an adjective or a noun? As an adjective Dynamic quality is >> indivisible, without boundaries, unpatterned (?). As a noun Dynamic Quality >> can be seen as the value that changes static (relative)(?) patterns of >> value. >> >> >> On 5/23/13 7:13 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Marsha: >>> Dynamic Quality is indivisible, without boundaries, unpatterned. There is >>> no-thing changing; yet Dynamic Quality can be seen as the value that changes >>> static (relative) patterns of value. >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
