On Aug 16, 2013, at 7:25 AM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> [djh] >>> Furthermore it doesn't change the fact that Marsha can see the value of >>> Dynamic Quality but not static quality. >> >> [Marsha] >> It is because I have directly experienced the unpatterned, that I can >> appreciate the patterned, which includes Intellectual patterns. > > [djh] > I disagree. I think that appreciating the unpatterned does not automatically > mean that you appreciate the patterned. Disagree if you like, but that's my experience. Maybe the "appreciation" happens when one is not trying to grasp either perspective. > These are two totally *different* types of quality. Intellectually that may be true, but is that still true from the 360-degree perspective? What good is an expanded rationality if it still demonstrates aggressiveness and uses character assassination to achieve its ends: same old, same old. It doesn't fit. I think some have skipped moving through the180-degree point, which is not an intellectual exercise. Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
